Clusters and benchmarks on the dynamics of nanoscience and nanotechnology
  • Français
  • English
Menu principal
Accueil
Nous contacter
Plan du site
Rechercher
Nuage de mots clés
Recherches
Nanotechnologies
Industrie et recherche
Le coin des cartes
Ressources
Glossaires
Bibliographie
Fiches de lecture
Info nano
Liens
 
 
On conceptualization, evidence and impact: A response to Hudson, Lagendijk and Peck

Book or journal references : Regional Studies, vol. 37, pp. 747-751 (2003).

Author(s) : Markusen , A.

Abstract :

Contemporary human geographers must work to clarify and translate new critical theory insights for a broader audience. Better evidence will both strengthen the theory-building exercise and render our insights more powerful in the real world of policy and action. In response to the critics of my original 'fuzzy concepts' paper, I welcome their several contributions the case for fuzziness as a tactical move, the need for subtle rather than grand critique and the means for strengthening qualitative research methods. I pose three further questions. Who is welcomed and/or excluded as participants in the dialogue? What is the usefulness of the deductive/inductive distinction? Is there a quantitative/qualitative divide? I argue for engaging additional academic and lay participants and for moving beyond the fetishism of the two methodological dualisms.


Keywords :

regional concepts; methodology; regional policy

©2006 - 2010 Clusters and benchmarks on the dynamics of nanoscience and nanotechnology